Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Does voting matter?

Dear Friends and Family,

This e-mail is about politics.  If you are offended by political
e-mails, I urge you to hit delete now.  But I hope you don't do that.
I invite you to read this, think about it, and act on it.  It's kind
of long, but I think you will find it worthwhile.

Next month our nation will hold crucial congressional elections.
Although some people claim that these elections don't matter, I
believe that they do – enormously.  All elections have consequences
for our lives, and that is true of this fall's contests.

I decided to do some digging about key issues that Congress has been
dealing with, to educate myself before the election.  I have finished
my research, and I can now tell you that when I go into the voting
booth, I will enthusiastically vote for Democratic candidates for the
U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.  I want the Democrats
to retain their majority, and I want to tell you why.  Here are ten
reasons.

1. The Democratic-led Congress enacted major reforms to the federal
student loan program for college students, freeing up an additional
$60 billion for students that would have gone for bank fees and
profits.

2. The Democratic-led Congress enacted a "bill of rights" for credit
card holders that will prevent credit card companies from gouging
ordinary people and wrecking their credit.  You are already seeing the
results of that law.

3. The Democratic-led Congress enacted major reforms to the banking
and financial sectors, reining in corporate excesses and restructuring
many things, so that our nation will not soon be wracked by the same
type of recession that hit us in 2008.  One part of that law is a new
consumer financial protection agency, an entity sorely needed.

4. The Democratic-led Congress enacted a significant income tax cut
for middle-class and working families last year.  The Republicans
don't want you to know about that, so they claim that Democrats oppose
tax cuts.  But the Republicans are wrong on this – Democrats cut
income taxes for the middle class.  If you don't believe me, please
look it up.

5. The Democratic-led Congress also enacted significant tax cuts for
small businesses – more than once.  Republicans enjoy ranting about
how Democrats hurt small businesses, but they are wrong on the facts.
Democrats have taken numerous steps to help small businesses,
including tax cuts.  If you don't believe me, please look it up.

6. The Democratic-led Congress enacted legislation to provide better
and more comprehensive health care to combat veterans from our recent
wars, as well as benefits to their caregivers.

7. The Democratic-led Congress raised the minimum wage to $7.25 per
hour.  When the Republicans held the majority, they stonewalled any
increase for years and years, exacerbating poverty and homelessness
for working Americans.  The Democrats also enacted a law guaranteeing
equal pay for women after the super-conservative, super-activist
Supreme Court said that existing law did not guarantee such equality.

8. The Democratic-led Congress passed a landmark health care bill that
we should all be thankful for.  Among its many provisions are these:
32 million people who have been without coverage will soon be able to
have it; insurance companies can no longer impose lifetime expenditure
limits on anyone, even those with major illnesses; no one can be
denied health coverage because of pre-existing conditions; all of us
now have a "patients' bill of rights;" and Medicare is strengthened
for years to come.  (Furthermore, everyone can keep their current
health coverage if they wish.)  These are huge steps forward for our
nation.  Ironically, on the very day that several of these provisions
took effect, Republican leaders declared their fundamental opposition
to such progress and vowed to repeal health care reform, including
these common-sense provisions, if they obtain a majority in Congress.
In addition to the comprehensive health care bill, the Democratic-led
Congress expanded the SCHIP program that provides health care for
at-risk low-income children, and strengthened the Medicaid program for
low-income adults.

9. The Democratic-led Congress faced up to the recession and extended
unemployment benefits for those who are out of work and unable to find
work, while Republicans strenuously opposed such payments to those in
great need.

10. Finally, there is the stimulus package, enacted by the
Democratic-led Congress.  Republicans rail endlessly about how
terrible it was, but a majority of unbiased economists declare it a
solid achievement, a real success.  Every American should be thankful
for Democrats' thoughtful and prompt action on the stimulus package,
because it helped to halt our steep slide into recession, and put
millions of unemployed folks back to work.  The stimulus package was
and is a solid, practical response to difficult times, a true building
block for the economic recovery.

Those are ten significant accomplishments by the Democrats, ten
reasons why they should be entrusted to continue leading Congress.
Not convinced yet?  Well, here are ten more.

11. The Democratic-led House enacted a major clean energy jobs bill
that will benefit our nation in numerous ways.  Senate Republicans
have so far blocked it in that chamber, but Democrats will keep trying
to achieve bipartisan approval.

12. Democrats have proposed a thoughtful, workable plan to deal with
immigration issues.  Republicans have no plan beyond rounding up
millions of immigrants and sending them back, plus placing more troops
at the Mexican border.

13. Democrats in Congress are striving to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't
Tell," so that every American who wants to serve in the military will
be permitted to do so.  Republicans have blocked repeal because they
fundamentally oppose full freedom for gay people.

14. Republican leaders have pledged to increase the nation's deficit
even further in order to cut taxes for the super-rich. They attempt to
scare the rest of us by suggesting that President Obama's proposal for
somewhat higher taxes on the super-rich will translate into higher
taxes on everyone, even though there is no evidence for that.

15. The Democratic-led Congress enacted an increase in vehicle fuel
standards that will both decrease our dependence on foreign sources of
oil and clean up our environment.

16. Several Republican candidates for Congress are committed to
privatizing Social Security, while Democrats strongly oppose such an
effort.  Imagine what pain and anguish would have set in among our
nation's seniors during this recession if their monthly Social
Security checks depended on the stock market.  Democrats will protect
Social Security and make it solvent for decades to come.  (In a
further attack on seniors, one Republican candidate has even pledged
to work for the elimination of Medicare.)

17. The Democratic-led Congress worked closely with President Bush in
2008 to enact the TARP bill, which prevented the recession from
becoming much more serious than it was.  We hear Republicans routinely
decry that bill, but it was actually a stunning bipartisan success,
saving many American companies and jobs.  Although the initial
projection for TARP expenditures was $700 billion, the success of the
program and the rapid rate of repayments now point to a final cost to
taxpayers of less than one-tenth of that amount.

18. Republican leaders announced their goal to remove reasonable rules
and controls on Wall Street, so that investment bankers can return to
their Wild West approach and make themselves richer.

19. The Democratic-led Congress voted to penalize American companies
that ship jobs overseas, while Republicans opposed that legislation.

20. Finally, the Republicans have several candidates who are truly
beyond the pale.  A Republican House candidate in Ohio enjoys wearing
a Nazi uniform in public and re-enacting Waffen-SS atrocities.  The
Republican Senate candidate in Alaska urged repeal of the 17th
Amendment, which provides for senators to be elected directly by the
people; he wants to go back to the days when state legislatures chose
senators, with lots of backroom horse-trading.  The Republican Senate
candidate in Kentucky called for repeal of the Civil Rights Act of
1965.  Some Republicans are backing repeal of the 14th Amendment,
which enabled the slaves to become full citizens of this country.

So, there is a summary of the choice that we face.  We can re-elect
the Democrats, the party that works to improve our nation and its
people, or we can bring back the Republicans, the party that promotes
fear, opposes progress and undermines liberty.  We can re-elect the
strong, thoughtful Congress that has been in place for the last four
years, or we can bring back the party that let business run amok,
creating economic collapse.

Here is another way to think about it: the Democrats in Congress will
do a better job on practically every issue than the Republicans.
Beyond the 20 points above, take a minute to think about: military
spending, nuclear weapons treaties, public education, terrorism,
reproductive choice, farm policy, climate change, stewardship of
natural resources, religious liberty, labor issues, meals-on-wheels,
transportation and Indian affairs.  I trust Democrats to handle all of
those matters in a more thoughtful and appropriate way than
Republicans.

As I said at the outset, elections have consequences, and this year is
no exception.  Voting for Tea Partyers and their cohorts is gambling
with everything that makes up America – our economy, our health, our
jobs, our infrastructure, our security, our liberty.

Big money is flowing to the Republicans in this election, hoping to
buy a Congress that will ignore the interests of ordinary people.
Earlier this year the conservatives on the Supreme Court dealt a major
blow to democracy when it essentially removed limits and controls on
secret financing of election campaign ads; the result is that tens of
millions of dollars have flooded into Republican coffers.  We need to
fight back with people power.

If you agree with this analysis, please consider taking the following steps:
(1) Forward this message widely.  Sent it to everyone in your address
book.  If you only like parts of it, forward the parts you like.  If
you want to cut and paste, feel free.  If you want to plagiarize, feel
free.  If you want to print it out and distribute hardcopies, feel
free; it is not copyrighted.  Just get it out quickly and widely.
(2) Go out and work for Democrats between now and November 2nd.  Knock
on doors, host a gathering, work at phone banks, hand out leaflets,
give some money to candidates.

Thank you for reading this and thinking about it.  If you have
questions, let me know.

Bob Tiller

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Bill Holmes for the PA House

Hi Folks,

Bill Holmes is running for the 167th District House seat. I hope you will support him. He is for good government and common sense government. See his website for more or click here for a google doc of his positions in detail.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Stimulus is a disaster

Our Democratic Party leadership has basically sold us out to the banks. They have stood by while the banks have looted the Treasury (borrowed money) and the Federal Reserve (printed money). By some estimates the cost of bank bailouts has already been enough to have paid off every mortgage in America. And after all this, the banks are still not solvent!

Now they have compromised too much and we have a half-hearted stimulus which will mostly build more roads and help buy more cars, resulting in more oil wars. When this bad stimulus combined with the bank throwaway fails to stop massive pain, the Democrats will get the blame.

The sad news is, as bad as our party is, the other is much, much worse. They are basically aligned with the super-rich, who love the cheap labor and cheap assets that a recession provides them.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Billions For Highways?

Fw: [PublicTransportationUsersforObama] Re: RE: Billions for Highways?

Thanks Virginia,

I think this could be the sleeper defeat of the decade, a chance like this comes only once in a lifetime. To see how we could do things better, just look at our neighbors' economic stimulus plan across the Pacific over in China:

They are spending $88 Billion on intercity rail alone, with other transportation projects totaling $2.6 trillion over two years, almost all railroads. They have built as many miles of High Speed Rail in two years than Europe has in two decades. Though they have some unfair advantages (easy seizure of private property, a war chest of cash, and little or no environmental review), but we can do far better. After all, we built the transcontinental railroad, the most ambitious project by far in the world at that time.

Remember to contact your local representative, and remind them to include public transportation in any stimulus package.

Sean in San Francisco

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Virginia Fitzpatrick <virginiafitzpatrick@comcast.net> wrote:

Sean

I was heartened to see that the Obama public transportation group was still active. Inspired by your remarks below I sent the following email (in red) to my US House Representative - The Honorable Jim Gerlach (Republican - voted against the TARP)

I appreciate your past support of public transportation and your concern about the TARP spending. Now I understand that Congress will vote on an economic recovery package that bows to the highway lobby by allocating 75% of transportation funding to build NEW roads. Please reconsider that allocation. Use transit expenditures to repair our roads and bridges and then use the rest to upgrade public transit. As our population ages we will become more dependent on Public transportation. We do not really want to compete with the Trucks on the highway. The population of the USA has more than doubled since I first learned to drive and the Auto is much less of a convenience. Parking lots mar our landscape. Runoff from roadways pollutes our Rivers and Streams. Our rural areas are covered with asphalt hills from expended roads.

I lived in Germany for 6 months and never needed an Auto. The city was much nicer without them. Less noise and congestion in the city center. There were small shops where I could pick up whatever groceries I needed when I stepped off the subway to walk to my apartment. Here in the USA we are forced to incur the dangers and expense of owning a car.

Please - We need a change of direction in our development of transportation

I will let you know if Gerlach responds

Virginia Fitzpatrick



From: Sean Hedgpeth [mailto:shedgpeth@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:57 PM
To: Public Transportation Users for Obama!
Subject: [PublicTransportationUsersforObama] Fwd: CALPIRG: Billions For Highways?

Only takes a second to send something, this is outrageous, we could build light rail and HSR all day with these funds, instead they are going to build suburban interchanges and new highways through national parks. Send this to your friends!




Take Action

Hi ,

This week, Congress is set to vote on an economic recovery package. It has the potential to breathe new life into our country's broken public transportation systems.

Yet, shockingly, the current proposal only allocates 25% of its transportation funding to transit projects, while 75% goes into building roads.

We can't let this happen. Speaker Pelosi's input is critical, and she needs to hear from Californians. Tell Speaker Pelosi to allocate more funding to public transportation.

We have a once in a lifetime opportunity to change the direction of this country, and invest in long-term solutions to the pollution, oil dependency and traffic problems caused by our drive-your-car-or-stay-at-home system.

Our own Transportation Associate Erin Steva put it well in a recent op-ed in the San Diego Union Tribune:

"Federal transportation money should be spent only on projects that advance long-term national goals, by reducing our dependence on oil, curbing global warming pollution, alleviating congestion, improving safety, and supporting healthy, sustainable communities. To reach these goals, emphasis should be placed on expanding light rail, commuter rail, rapid bus service, high-speed intercity rail and other forms of modern public transportation. At least as much money should be allocated to these transportation modes as to roads and highways."

Public transportation not only reduces our addiction to oil -- and the harmful global warming pollution that addiction produces -- transit projects also create more jobs and reduce more traffic than the road-building alternative.

In fact, we know that every dollar invested in transit projects creates 20% more jobs than money spent on road-building.

We already moving on the right track. More than 2.8 billion trips were taken on public transportation in the third quarter of 2008 -- an increase of 6.5 percent over the third quarter of 2007. California voters approved local ballot measures for transit such as Measure R in Los Angeles County, and statewide ballot measures, such as Prop 1A for high-speed rail. Those projects depend on funding from Congress to match California's commitment to improving transit.

The Economic Recovery Package presents an opportunity to make significant progress in building a better transportation future. Increasing funding for public transportation would benefit California greatly, but Speaker Pelosi is under a lot of pressure to allocate funding to roads instead.

She is hearing from road builders and other powerful developers. Now she needs to hear from you:

http://www.calpirg.org/action/world-class-public-transit/pelosi?id=ES


Sincerely,


Emily Rusch
CALPIRG
EmilyR@calpirg.org
http://www.calpirg.org

P.S. Thanks again for your support. Please feel free to share this e-mail with your family and friends.


Friday, November 21, 2008

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Saturday, October 18, 2008

The most important people...

The most important people in the world: block captains. Why?

We are the local connection to the political system. The political system determines public policy. There are only two powers in politics:

1. Money
2. People

Take responsibility for our future. Be a block captain. And do it your way.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Give me 3 hours and I'll give you 4 great years!

Dear Neighbors,

We have 25 days to go. That translates to 600 hours. This week, I need 3 of those hours to help change the future of this country. Can you help?

We need people to knock on doors THIS WEEKEND! On Saturday we are meeting at the Exton Post Office in the Exton Square Mall.

Saturday 11am- http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/canvass/gshvbx

Saturday 3pm- http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/canvass/gshvs9

AND we are meeting on Sunday at Kerr Park in Downingtown (Wallace Ave)

Sunday 12:30- http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/canvass/gshvly


We also need phonebankers at the office! Please reply to this email to schedule!

Mon-Sat 10-1, 1-5, 5-9

Sunday 12-5, 5-9

Thanks!

Eddy K. Foster - Field Organizer
Barack Obama's Campaign for Change
(c) 610-306-0672

Friday, October 3, 2008

Paulson profited from rule change that led to collapse

...Many events in Washington, on Wall Street and elsewhere around the country have led to what has been called the most serious financial crisis since the 1930s. But decisions made at a brief meeting on April 28, 2004, explain why the problems could spin out of control. The agency’s failure to follow through on those decisions also explains why Washington regulators did not see what was coming.
On that bright spring afternoon, the five members of the Securities and Exchange Commission met in a basement hearing room to consider an urgent plea by the big investment banks.
They wanted an exemption for their brokerage units from an old regulation that limited the amount of debt they could take on. The exemption would unshackle billions of dollars held in reserve as a cushion against losses on their investments. Those funds could then flow up to the parent company, enabling it to invest in the fast-growing but opaque world of mortgage-backed securities; credit derivatives, a form of insurance for bond holders; and other exotic instruments.
The five investment banks led the charge, including Goldman Sachs, which was headed by Henry M. Paulson Jr. Two years later, he left to become Treasury Secretary.
A lone dissenter — a software consultant and expert on risk management — weighed in from Indiana with a two-page letter to warn the commission that the move was a grave mistake. He never heard back from Washington.
One commissioner, Harvey J. Goldschmid, questioned the staff about the consequences of the proposed exemption. It would only be available for the largest firms, he was reassuringly told — those with assets greater than $5 billion.
“We’ve said these are the big guys,” Mr. Goldschmid said, provoking nervous laughter, “but that means if anything goes wrong, it’s going to be an awfully big mess.”... NYTimes

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Credit crunch scare used to steal more taxes

Have you had enough of supply-side economics yet? Think about it. Which is the reason that a business expands?

a. someone gave the boss a bunch of free taxpayer money.
b. customer orders exceed production capacity.

The answer is that our economy is demand driven. When Reagan first campaigned in primaries on supply-side economics, George H. W. Bush called it "voodoo economics." The wall street "geniuses" have run off with billions of investor money, now the institutions are failing, and they want the taxpayer to pump more money to the top (see choice a. above). If we don't give them our wallet, "there will be a credit lockdown! Just look at the crunch now! " Read on for more perspective on this:

...The bottom line is that we have badly over-leveraged banks who are on the edge of collapse and we have a credit tightening due to an economic downturn. These problems are related, but even if we could snap our fingers and make the banks healthy again tomorrow, we would still have a serious credit problem due to the recession. In other words, many of the businesses and people who have been appearing on news shows because they could not get credit would still not be able to get credit. (Although they probably will not be appearing on the news shows once the bailout passes.)

Just to remind everyone the cause is the loss of more than $4 trillion in housing equity due to the collapse of the housing bubble. The collapse of this bubble has not only devastated the construction and real estate market, it also has forced consumers to cut back. Tens of millions of homeowners no longer have any equity against which to borrow. Even those who still have equity realize that they will have to increase their savings to support themselves in retirement.

And all this came about because the experts who are now insisting that we need a bailout had previously insisted that there was no housing bubble and that everything was just fine. It is always important to keep things in context. -- Dean Baker on Huffington